Quote:
Originally Posted by pornopete
1) Yes my first point is arguable, but that is not the issue. Stick to the issue. You have no argument to my points as they are all valid and you are trying to waver away the argument.
2) I didn't say it was new, I said it existed, and its obvious you where aware of this yet you tried to debunk my statement, why?
|
Let's go over your points again..
1) Every NATS program has master accounts, it's the owners job to turn them on and off.
2) Not only 1 affiliate program, 6 total now have posted and I'm sure 100's of others used the IP security features.
3) NATS passwords are reversable? Yeah and?
4) They acually do and did change admin passwords.. Just not enough with a strong enough policy. Like the Program owners they thought the security was strong.
5) NATS has left old source code on the servers, which has changed several times. It's nothing big, it's encrypted and able to be reversed to some degree.
6) inpentrable fortress as you stated, and again everything online can be hacked or exploited, so "assuming" this is your mistake.
7) SQL injects, NATS has had this problem before and it was corrected. So has other affiliate packages, hosted galleries, software all over the net is open to SQL injects. It's a continual battle to stay on top of these top of exploits and nats has acually done a pretty good job with this.
And I did debunk your statement because it's wrong, you stated "NATs has a built in feature that allows program owners to approve/disapprove an affiliates sale" That is flat wrong.
Any other points that need to be covered?