Originally Posted by WarChild

Could you tell us a little about your formal training in Engineering and maybe a little about your real life experience in a related field?

I wonder, are you more qualified than say Thomas W. Eagar, the Thomas Lord Professor of Materials Engineering and Engineering Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology?

So again, what makes you so qualified that you can say absolutely without a shadow of a doubt that those buildings were blown up? Why would we take your simple statement of "couldn't have happened" over in depth analysis that have been performed by actual Engineers? Please tell us how you concluded something was not possible when others seemingly way more qualified have come to a completely different conclusion?