Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
Could you tell us a little about your formal training in Engineering and maybe a little about your real life experience in a related field?
I wonder, are you more qualified than say Thomas W. Eagar, the Thomas Lord Professor of Materials Engineering and Engineering Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology?
So again, what makes you so qualified that you can say absolutely without a shadow of a doubt that those buildings were blown up? Why would we take your simple statement of "couldn't have happened" over in depth analysis that have been performed by actual Engineers? Please tell us how you concluded something was not possible when others seemingly way more qualified have come to a completely different conclusion?
|
I would have to say that they probably did not come to that conclusion. They were told what to say and they said it. Just like the eyewitnesses to united 93 getting shot down. People lived about a mile from the crash site and the ones who claim they saw it all have the same exact story. "I saw 2 planes flying low to the ground right behind it and the tail end of it was on fire and then all of a sudden, boom! I assume thats when the plane actually crashed into the ground." FBI has told them "No, that's not what happend...the plane(s) you saw were actually 3,000 feet up in the air taking pictures of the crash site."