Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Step 1, he cannot "own" GFY for posts made by members.
Step 2, the threads discuss a post made by an intial member. There is only one source for this information, and therefore only one person to "own"
Step 3, Mr Weiner would have to prove in a court of law that this is not true, that he is not a poor tipper, and that the information was not only spread, but that the intent was malicious.
I wish Mr Weiner luck, and I am sure that co-council Mr Bun will be there to help him catch up.
|
Alex... I think you missed the point I was making..
The point I am making is this
When you have a firm of that size ... with that many lawyers ... with those specific areas of practice
.... you dont go to court ... you dont contest... they send you a letter telling you what to do... and you do it
no company in its right mind ( GFY included ) is going to hire an attorney to prove its OK to have the partner of a major law firm drug across a porn forum lol
people like that have power you wouldnt understand... he dosent have to prove or do anything except make a phone call or send a letter on his 100 plus law firms letterhead and whatever or whoever host or own whatever will simply bow the fuck dow
....I know I would
watch those threads get deleted. I wouldnt spend one red cent in legal fees to protect a forum post .... from a huge law firm at that