Quote:
Originally posted by Big Monkie
Ok, your concerns are notable. But do you really have any reason to believe that whatever govt we INSTALL there will be any more stable? After all, it doesnt appear that saddam has done anything aggressive in the last dozen years, maybe because he knows he would be crushed if he did. And do you really think that doing this will result in less terrorism and not more? Nobody is saying saddam is a cool guy, but think about what you are saying here. This will result in more trouble, not less.
|
Reguardless, the current goverment in Iraq has been given enough chances to comply with the demands of the international community. It has become unfortunately obvious that Iraq has no intentions of following the resolutions.
Sadam doesnt have to be aggressive as far as anyone here knows he could of already disturbuted weapons to terrorist groups. The point is that he shouldnt have them.
As far as a new goverment that we install being more unstable, that is unlikely. But for example if you hire a employee that doesnt do the job and replace him with a worse one. Eventually you will find the man for the job. I guess I can put it that way.