Quote:
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
I have same concerns and I already plan on still following what I feel are justifiable 2257 guidelines. I will collect two forms of ID (I know only 1 was required), I will get a full release, I will gather up past names used, I will continue to keep a clause in my release about sharing edited ID's, still keep dates of production listed, and of course still cross reference some so that any given set will have an identifiable 2257 file.
Same requirement will be for anyone I have shoot for me or that I buy from. Well they do not need to cross reference, etc but the rest is a requirement.
Now honestly this will not alter the amateur porn / real honest to gawd user submitted and created stuff cause they had no fucking clue about 2257 anyways, a lot like webmasters. However I also see some scummy fucks passing some illegal shit our direction. If I recall ignorance doesnt get you far in a court room.
|
Sounds like a solid plan.
One thing is for sure, expect an onslaught of foreign content, especially from places like Asia where there are 1000s of girls with no IDs at all or are underage working in the sex industry. The Philippines for example is jammed packed with girls with shit IDs and very few with real government issued. Cambodia is now a shooting option, most of them don't have IDs and Thailand is going to be free-for-all with all the fake IDs those girls have. Same with Vietnam.
And how about all those Russian teen (16 - 17 years) sites that used to be around? Those will come back. They would be stupid not to bring them back.
So that brings up another snag. Will processors process for sites with this questionable content since there is not going to have to be (if 2257 totally crashes) any proof of age? Now they sometimes ask for IDs and since we should already have them, we can give them. But if we are not required to have them, then what?
This is a slippery slope.
