Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Red
|
Well Miller and Reno/sun dance were also district rulings that were primarily held throughout the land, not a certainty though.
As for the main question though, not only will I not ditch my 2257 documents, I will continue to cross reference, digitally track, as well as only purchase content that is what was known as 2257 compliant. Still fairly certain ignorance is not a defense and I really do not wish to be the first in a court room saying well they told me she was 18 when I ordered that content.
My question is this, can those who were inspected in California as well as Florida go back to the courts and claim that the searches were illegal due to the fact that 2257 is unconstitutional and thus force rulings in other districts?