Judge Drops Rape Charge Against Man Because Victim Was Hooker - Charges Theft Instead - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

BoyAlley

So Fucking Gay

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 19714
Share

Post
#1

Judge Drops Rape Charge Against Man Because Victim Was Hooker - Charges Theft Instead

10-21-2007, 11:41 AM

A DEFENDANT accused of forcing a prostitute at gunpoint to have sex with him and three other men got lucky, so to speak, last week.

A Philadelphia judge dropped all sex and assault charges at his preliminary hearing.

Municipal Judge Teresa Carr Deni instead held the defendant on the bizarre charge of armed robbery for - get this - "theft of services."

http://www.philly.com/dailynews/colu...e_system_.html

Unbelievable....................
Tags: None
ThunderBalls

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 2926
Share

Post
#2

10-21-2007, 11:43 AM

Makes sense to me.
Comment
Just Alex

Liv Benson to You, Bitch

Join Date: Aug 2007

Posts: 6060
Share

Post
#3

10-21-2007, 11:46 AM

well, she was at work.
Comment
Elli

Reach for those stars!

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 17991
Share

Post
#4

10-21-2007, 11:53 AM

Wow. That's one heck of a precedent. I hope she appeals.

email: [email protected]
Comment
hateman

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 1623
Share

Post
#5

10-21-2007, 11:56 AM

Hookers a lying sacks of shit.

The charges were most probably fake.
Comment
sortie

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2007

Posts: 7771
Share

Post
#6

10-21-2007, 12:44 PM

Well, if she agreed to have sex for a price before he pulled out the gun then maybe it is theft since the consent to sex was already established and it was only the price that was in dispute.

It's still bullshit though.

Last edited by sortie; 10-21-2007, 12:46 PM.
Comment
fatfoo

ICQ:649699063

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 27763
Share

Post
#7

10-21-2007, 01:00 PM

haha, that is weird

Send me an email: [email protected]
Comment
crockett

in a van by the river

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 76818
Share

Post
#8

10-21-2007, 01:07 PM

Theft of services I guess?

In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Comment
hateman

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 1623
Share

Post
#9

10-21-2007, 01:12 PM

Originally posted by crockett

Theft of services I guess?

what services? prostitution is illegal.
Comment
Drake

Hello world!

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12508
Share

Post
#10

10-21-2007, 01:24 PM

I don't think she's lying since the article says that the same thing happened to another woman 4 days later involving the same guy(s). Neither of the women knew each other.
Comment
KingK7

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 6372
Share

Post
#11

10-21-2007, 01:26 PM

He stole her pussy?
Comment
BoyAlley

So Fucking Gay

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 19714
Share

Post
#12

10-21-2007, 01:26 PM

Originally posted by sortie

Well, if she agreed to have sex for a price before he pulled out the gun then maybe it is theft since the consent to sex was already established.

FYI TO BREEDERS: A woman can withdraw consent at any time. No means no, and stop means stop. Period.
Comment
Oracle Porn

Affiliate

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 24433
Share

Post
#13

10-21-2007, 01:27 PM

Originally posted by sortie

Well, if she agreed to have sex for a price before he pulled out the gun then maybe it is theft since the consent to sex was already established and it was only the price that was in dispute.

It's still bullshit though.
Comment
pornask

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 6518
Share

Post
#14

10-21-2007, 01:28 PM

So even hookers at work are now looking for quick buck by suing people? WTF???
Comment
Libertine

sex dwarf

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 17860
Share

Post
#15

10-21-2007, 01:28 PM

Originally posted by sortie

Well, if she agreed to have sex for a price before he pulled out the gun then maybe it is theft since the consent to sex was already established and it was only the price that was in dispute.

It's still bullshit though.

Consent is something that can be taken away at any time - the moment someone refuses, it's gone.

You could compare this case to someone asking a girl at a club if she wants to come home with him for sex, her agreeing and coming along, only to change her mind when they arrive. Pulling a gun on the girl from the club and gang-raping her would quite clearly still be rape, even if she consented to sex at some earlier point.

It doesn't matter that the woman in this particular case was a prostitute, and it doesn't matter that she agreed to sex for money under different circumstances. What matters is that the victim was forced to have sex with these guys against her will - at gunpoint, no less.

The judge's decision is sickening, because she doesn't seem to be aware of the one major feature of rape: lack of consent at the moment the act occurs. It doesn't matter if the victim is a whore, a slut, Mother Theresa or a porn star. It doesn't matter if the victim is married to the offender. The moment someone says no, it's time to stop.

/(bb|[^b]{2})/
Comment
Silly Guy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2007

Posts: 1421
Share

Post
#16

10-21-2007, 01:34 PM

"It's true the prostitute negotiated sex with the defendant - but not unprotected gang sex at gunpoint."

that about sums it up....crazy decision
Comment
Xplicit

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 3558
Share

Post
#17

10-21-2007, 02:32 PM

I'm not saying what he did was ok - BUT she should have been expecting it.

This happens to almost all prositiutes, if she met even 1 or 2 other ones she would know this.

Its all because its illegal, what woman is gonna goto the police saying "the guy was supposed to pay for sex but he didn't!" ?

Its so strange we have laws that actually make women a prime target for rape, while at the same time increasing the guy's risk of getting STDs. If it was legal these girls would be operating in fairly safe environments and getting STD tested by law.
Comment
Just Alex

Liv Benson to You, Bitch

Join Date: Aug 2007

Posts: 6060
Share

Post
#18

10-21-2007, 02:44 PM

Originally posted by BoyAlley

FYI TO BREEDERS: A woman can withdraw consent at any time. No means no, and stop means stop. Period.

have you ever had to say NO?
Comment
BoyAlley

So Fucking Gay

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 19714
Share

Post
#19

10-21-2007, 02:46 PM

Originally posted by Alexis Content

have you ever had to say NO?

Silly breeder, faggots never say no........
Comment
xmas13

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 5176
Share

Post
#20

10-21-2007, 02:54 PM

Originally posted by Silly Guy

"It's true the prostitute negotiated sex with the defendant - but not unprotected gang sex at gunpoint."

that about sums it up....crazy decision

Sick

The judge decision is putting the health of other prostitutes in danger.

UNPROTECTED RAPE= THEFT OF SERVICES?

ICQ 557504926
Comment
sortie

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2007

Posts: 7771
Share

Post
#21

10-21-2007, 03:06 PM

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
Comment
gecko

******

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 21846
Share

Post
#22

10-21-2007, 03:15 PM

That is fucked up

[email protected]
Comment
SmokeyTheBear

►SouthOfHeaven

Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 28609
Share

Post
#23

10-21-2007, 03:58 PM

Originally posted by Libertine

Consent is something that can be taken away at any time - the moment someone refuses, it's gone.

You could compare this case to someone asking a girl at a club if she wants to come home with him for sex, her agreeing and coming along, only to change her mind when they arrive. Pulling a gun on the girl from the club and gang-raping her would quite clearly still be rape, even if she consented to sex at some earlier point.

It doesn't matter that the woman in this particular case was a prostitute, and it doesn't matter that she agreed to sex for money under different circumstances. What matters is that the victim was forced to have sex with these guys against her will - at gunpoint, no less.

The judge's decision is sickening, because she doesn't seem to be aware of the one major feature of rape: lack of consent at the moment the act occurs. It doesn't matter if the victim is a whore, a slut, Mother Theresa or a porn star. It doesn't matter if the victim is married to the offender. The moment someone says no, it's time to stop.

your assuming she said no..

she may have agreed to the sex , even with multiple men then when it was time to pay they pulled a gun. it would be hardly fair to clasify that as rape .. its certainly not legal but i dont think i would call that rape. i would be inclined to call that armed robbery

infact a likely scenario may have been they asked to have sex for $x and she assumed they meant $x for each guy , when she realised she was only getting $x for all the men ,she asked for the cash, they pulled a gun told her to fuck off.

hatisblack at yahoo.com
Comment
Libertine

sex dwarf

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 17860
Share

Post
#24

10-26-2007, 02:35 PM

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear

your assuming she said no..

she may have agreed to the sex , even with multiple men then when it was time to pay they pulled a gun. it would be hardly fair to clasify that as rape .. its certainly not legal but i dont think i would call that rape. i would be inclined to call that armed robbery

infact a likely scenario may have been they asked to have sex for $x and she assumed they meant $x for each guy , when she realised she was only getting $x for all the men ,she asked for the cash, they pulled a gun told her to fuck off.

The story mentions that "the gun was pulled and more men arrived", and that she didn't agree to "unprotected gang sex at gunpoint". That basically says that she was threatened before sex with those other men took place, and that she was forced to have unprotected sex which she didn't consent to.

/(bb|[^b]{2})/
Comment
SCtyger

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 564
Share

Post
#25

10-26-2007, 03:27 PM

thats why all prositutes need Pimps! keep the pimp hand strong!

http://www.silvercash.com/
Comment
tenletters

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 2079
Share

Post
#26

10-26-2007, 04:37 PM

Originally posted by SCtyger

thats why all prositutes need Pimps! keep the pimp hand strong!

indeed... this isn't a case that should go to court. Ever see the movie 'I spit on your grave' ??

Useless Without Pics
Comment
Ron Bennett

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 1653
Share

Post
#27

10-26-2007, 05:03 PM

How can it be "theft of service", when said service is illegal?

Or is prostitution legal now in Philly?

Ron

Domagon - Website Management and Domain Name Sales
Comment
VeriSexy

Join The Royal Family

Join Date: Apr 2002

Posts: 25463
Share

Post
#28

10-26-2007, 07:20 PM

fucked up all around

Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos.
With TOP RATIO Sites like

TeenStarsOnly.com - Earn $$ with our New Site & Bonus Payouts!!

ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com | TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com
Comment
tony286

lurker

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 57021
Share

Post
#29

10-26-2007, 07:37 PM

thats very fucked up.
Comment
C_U_Next_Tuesday

WW4L

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 10581
Share

Post
#30

10-26-2007, 08:03 PM

Rape is rape no matter what the occupation of said victim is
Comment
RawAlex

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 9465
Share

Post
#31

10-26-2007, 08:05 PM

Originally posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday

Rape is rape no matter what the occupation of said victim is

Would it have been rape if they paid her $20 first? Perhaps they entered into a contract and failed to pay.
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...