Quote:
Originally Posted by D
meh. So what?
|
I hate it when authors do that. A work (or set of works) should stand alone. If you need to explain that one of the characters is gay at a book reading then what the fuck? Sure, there were vague clues there but it was never integral to the plot and was never an issue in any of the books. It made no difference to the story if Dubledore was gay, straight or bi. I don't see how she can say it's about tolerance when it was never mentioned.
It would be like Conan Doyle's ghost visiting saying that watson was gay. Who cares other than for attention or to sell books?