Quote:
Originally Posted by D
His environmental work.
He's been working to educate the populace in regards to environmental issues since he was in college.
His nomination did kinda represent a shift in the traditional characteristics of what defines a Peace Prize recipient - usually it's been held for statesmen and individuals who worked in Human Rights... but I guess there's something to be said for bringing the world together in the link between peace and the state of our environment.
I mean, if we destroy the climatic balance in which we evolved and our civilizations and societies emerged, I reckon there's not much chance of peace, eh? Less area for a growing population to live on = more competition for resources = an inflated chance of war.
From a perspective, it's the promotion of peace on a grand scale. And, those that are in a place to make such decisions wanted to reward him for those efforts.
Makes sense to me.
|
This would be a valid argument if global warming existed... Does it?
__________________
"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." -Patton
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." -Plato
|