Quote:
Your talking about extending your right beyond those granted by the law (because the law exclude fair use from your ACT assigned exclusive rights) using technology.
This is an area that is NOT protected by the Statutes, it is infact explicitly excluded, the economic burden is cause because you want to claim a rights that are explicitly excluded by the statue.
The copyright act has not been overrun, it just as valid as it was before. The same technology that has allowed a previously inaccessable "Fair use" as significantly reduced the cost of production for your content which means the technology is balanced in the scope of copyright.
Like the VCR/VTR technology which reduced the cost of transporting the content (vs broadcasting lives across the air ways) and expose the previously inaccessible fair use "time-shifting". digital distribution does the same thing.
|
I don?t even understand most of this portion as your grammar is very poor.
The last part addressing reducing the cost of transport is a bit funny though. VCRs did nothing to reduce the cost of delivery, rather they increased the cost. If a distributor wanted to get their product to the end user, broadcast is inevitably cheaper, but obviously less secure, especially when you want to be compensated for the use of your content. Time shifting (which you overextend on every occasion) is intended to be used privately, in home. The minute you take your copy of that content and share it, you have become a distributor or broadcaster, which you have no right to.
Quote:
|
You are the one that is making the insane conclusion that you should exclusive protections IN THE SCOPE THAT IS EXPLICITLY EXCLUDED BY THE ACT.
|
Wow, difficult to read again. You may not have made it through 4th grade, I will have to rethink that insult against you.
I claim my right to control my product and it is not insane. It is the same rights claimed by every other producer. You, the lecherous end user, are claiming that our work is for your entertainment and for your good and use and that you have rights that supercede ours. You are wrong.
Make all the claims you like. Quote the portions of the law that you like. Abandon all levels of common sense where you assume that you as the end user somehow have rights that allow you to control my content more than I can. It makes no difference to me. We can keep going back and forth all you like. It?s entertaining. Stupid, but entertaining.