Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Pretty much says it right there.
|
And this is exactly the time of misrepresentation i keep talking about
you take a quote from the section explicitly labeled "AUTHORIZED TIMESHIFTING" to justify invalidating "UNAUTHORIZED TIMESHIFTING"
the funny part is just below that part there is a sections B. UNAUTHORIZED TIMESHIFTING"
Quote:
Moreover, the definition of exclusive rights in 106 of the present Act is prefaced by the words "subject to sections 107 through 118." Those sections describe a variety of uses of copyrighted material that "are not infringements of copyright" "notwithstanding the provisions of section 106." The most pertinent in this case is 107, the legislative endorsement of the doctrine of "fair use." 29 [464 U.S. 417, 448]
|
not only does this paragraph prove the point i have repeatedly made that "Fair use" trumps the exclusive rights granted in section 106 but it also disproves all the crap you have been saying about personal use, and different levels of fair use, and yes even the arguement that torrent is only point to content for infringement purposes.
Use of a torrent for fair use purposes "are not infringements of copyright"
which in turn means all of the quote you keep spouting about how the "First ammendment does apply" because it an infringing technology also don't apply.
Given the fact that a pc could handle a maximum 256 connections assuming one goes to the tracker that 255 connection available to seed to. If the file is brokening into more than 255 pieces (most are broken into at least 1000). The maximum swarm density i could obtain before i successfully gave any one person a WORKING COPY of your content is 254.
That is the equivalent of burning the content to 254 dvd and storing them in 254 safety deposit boxes and that is all before i have made a single "POTENTIAL" (because if the downloader is getting the copy for the fair use right of recovery it is also "not infringements of copyright") infringement of your copyright.