Originally Posted by gideongallery

ok that is only 1700 of the 21,000 she admitted to sharing so what about the rest.

The RIAA chose to not go after her for the songs she could prove she owned BEFORE she downloaded the songs as well.

They did the same thing in the case of "Cecilia Gonzalez" only targeting her for the 30 songs out 1300 that she did not own.




again if that were true then she would have been convicted for a lot more violations
since the RIAA specifically choose to exclude songs that she owned from the ruling thereby limiting the scope only to songs she did not buy a right to.

having files "you have never owned" in your Kazaa shared folder is enough to prove intent to distribute, which is exactly the point i have repeatedly made.





well considering that the case ignored the circumstance where you the person owned some rights to the music (by choice by the RIAA) and didn't target Kazaa that makes sense

The point is you are pointing to the case and arguing that it INCREASES their liablity which is equally false.