Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
again you are trying to ignore the facts to make YOUR substandard point
she ripped her songs to the My music folder
Kazza in the default install (the one she used shares everything in the My music folder)
She admitted to 21,000 "sharings"
She was only convicted of 24 "sharings"
The court case made a distinction between the 24 she got convicted for and the 20,976 she did not.
IF you were right about how strong the copyright act was she would have been convicted of all of the "Sharings"
SHE WAS NOT
That the point
You have to
1. determine what the difference is
2. modify your stance to acknowledge that difference.
there is no point explaining anything to you as long as you keep ignoring all the facts that don't fit your opinion
|
Even one violation is breaking the law.
you are using the numbers and I don't believe you are accurate. I am looking for the information.
I am still waiting for you to point me to where in section 106 and 107 or any case law where it says you can act in any capacity to distribute copyrighted material.
I gave you in 106 where I get to retain my distribution rights... where's the support on your side?