Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
I have never rejected the legitimacy of what they are doing, because that is exactly the act i have been arguing they should be doing-- going after the INFRINGING SEEDER directly.
What i reject is your arguement that this win grants the RIAA and you more rights than explicitly specified in the case.
(see your arguements that KAZZA and by extension Torrents/ torrentspy, isohunt, TPB etc) are liable.
This lady never produced any proof she owned the content in question
and secondly RIAA produced proof of infringement that exceed previously defined speculative claim (Interscope v. Rodriguez)
she is exactly the type of seeder who should be removed from the p2p network so that fair use people like myself can enjoy the technology available.
|
Gideon.. keep going.. you didn't get to the part in the filing about distribution rights.... you can't avoid that part... nowhere in the case was fair use addressed that said you can share with others.
Point me to the case law that says you can do that... quote it.. take me to it so I can read it!!!