Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Which brings me to my point. 2257 laws are not "proactive" but instead "reactive". "They" try to tell the public that they are doing someting about child porn with this law, but in truth they aren't stopping it but only looking for proof of it after the fact. It's a total waste of time.
|
Interesting point and I have to admit I didn't get it on the first read.
But after thinking a bit, the inspection on performers ID BEFORE a shoot would be the proactive measure that prevented cp. So good point.
They way the gov wants it is that even though you validated IDs and are totally legal you still go to jail if you ever lose a piece of paper.