Quote:
Originally Posted by Elli
"Another violation involved having too much data with the records for a given title, Dolan said. In that instance, records for performers who had nonsex roles in the video were included in the records for the performers who did engage in sexually explicit conduct. Curing that violation involved merely removing the records for the nonsex performers, Dolan said."
I thought we had to have records for everyone if there was someone being naked/sexual in the frame pretty much? Now we only need the people being sexual?
|
A few things here:
1) After gathering more info, my understanding is that the inspection team did not write up a violation for having records for people who participated in nonsex roles mixed in with those who engaged in sex acts; they were only interested in the IDs for those that engaged in sex acts, but it was not considered a "violation" that the other IDs/docs were in there.
2) Regardless of what the FBI considers to be a violation or not a violation, theirs is not the final say in all this. As far as how the law is interpreted for the purposes of prosecuting alleged offenders, that's entirely up to the DOJ. (That said, if the FBI does not cite you for a given "violation," even if the DOJ wouldn't agree that you were compliant on that point, it is highly unlikely that you would be prosecuted for the violation in question.)
3) Regardless of what the FBI, producers who have been inspected, or any of the adult media outlets and representatives say (myself definitely included) you should speak at length to an attorney with relevant knowledge and expertise about your individual situation, and get specific and detailed advice about what you need to do to be and stay 2257 compliant.