View Single Post
Old 09-26-2007, 02:48 AM  
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by commonsense View Post
That's a dif business model completely. If you want to sell your overexposed crap for $2, go to town. Many places are giving it away free as lost leader to lure in surfers (on tubes and elsewhere) so you might have troubles even at a $2 price point.

Trying to sell the same filler stuff you're whoring out must really suck. I get the feeling that the content you make means nothing to you and you'd sell it all to anyone who offers you 5 cents. I'm sure that turns off other affiliates from promoting you, I know it does for me.
Get a calculator and work out how many times we have to sell a scene to get it in front of 10% of Teen paysites members. Pretty awesome sales don't you agree?

Or are you telling everyone we sell a scene to 10 clients, who can't put it on TGPs, and that's enough to saturate the scene. With 2,000 teen paysites the notion that content can be so easily saturated is foolish.

Unless we sell it 200 times. 200 x $40 = $8,000 a scene.

Can anyone explain how content gets "over exposed" in a major niche? It's on lots of great sites that have lots of members who see it. Must be good content that members like.

It's all over the place on free sites. This applies to Exclusive content and is about the number of affiliates whoring it.

It's crap over exposed content that will never sell on a site. So how is it getting over exposed?

As for the example of $2 sites, it was an example of making more money selling for less. Seems to many have never heard of Kay Mart and Woolworth or Video Box.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote