Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
let me recap for you.
a head of state thats widely known to fund and sponsor terrorism wants to visit a site of the most significant terrorist event on the planet, in front of the worlds media to "lay a wreath at the site" .... BUT of course he also will give a short speech for his own political benefit about terrorism, US policies, "causes of terrorism" etc etc etc. to the worlds media who are fully covering the event.
|
So, to summarize, "freedom of speech is dangerous if we don't control who is speaking".
Do you find any irony in that?