Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
if they attack usa's children , the rest of the world will sympathize with the usa, so they first attack the supporters
|
I like that statement, however I dont think they attack britain because we support america, i think they attack us, because we are just as bad as america in how we have attacked and our way of life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
They only needed to attack the USA once. Look what chaos they have caused us just from that one attack. Look at how we lost a little but of our freedom that day. They wanted a war, and they got one. Now they can pick us apart one man at a time.
They are coming to Iraq from other countries just to fight Americans!!! If you ask me, they already won and we lost. You can't win against an idea.
|
They only need to,, yes... but im sure more attacks would only make things worse for the US dont you think?
Quote:
Originally Posted by uno
Yep, they wait years between attacks. 6 isn't much.
|
Who are they? Alqueda? I would have though they were quite big, and as soon as they were ready they would attack. They have cells galore and the more attacks the better I would have thought.
Quote:
Originally Posted by he-fox
D): because it's easier to attack US troops in Irak?
|
Disagree - British have troops in iraq too that get attacked yet cells are being found every 6 months or so. Spain got attacked in madrid and before then they also had troops. 2 examples there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks
Perhaps GWB is doing something right.
|
I dont see any logic in that statment, then again, I dont see anything logical from you. Ever.