Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripshit
Take a closer look at the vids of the supposed Boeingthen and you wanna put money on it?
Just show me some fucking widows like a commercial plane would have!
We are not talking about Terrorists hijacking planes here we are talking a government producing 9/11 and making it look like the middle east to cause the whole country to get up in arms about going to war on terror!
I also think that flight 93 was a joke it wasnt shot down or crashed into a feild it landed in Ohio!
|
Show me a video or picture of no windows on those planes, I have yet seen one.
Sorry you really should do some unbiased research before coming here and making claims, everything you've talked about has already been dispproved
Bulge under the pane??
One of the clearest, most widely seen pictures of the doomed jet's undercarriage was taken by photographer Rob Howard and published in New York magazine and elsewhere (opening page). PM sent a digital scan of the original photo to Ronald Greeley, director of the Space Photography Laboratory at Arizona State University. Greeley is an expert at analyzing images to determine the shape and features of geological formations based on shadow and light effects. After studying the high-resolution image and comparing it to photos of a Boeing 767-200ER's undercarriage, Greeley dismissed the notion that the Howard photo reveals a "pod." In fact, the photo reveals only the Boeing's right fairing, a pronounced bulge that contains the landing gear. He concludes that sunlight glinting off the fairing gave it an exaggerated look. "Such a glint causes a blossoming (enlargement) on film," he writes in an e-mail to PM, "which tends to be amplified in digital versions of images ? the pixels are saturated and tend to 'spill over' to adjacent pixels." When asked about pods attached to civilian aircraft, Fred E. Culick, professor of aeronautics at the California Institute of Technology, gave a blunter response: "That's bull. They're really stretching."
FOX News broadcast a live phone interview with FOX employee Marc Birnbach. 911inplanesite.com states that "Bernback" saw the plane "crash into the South Tower." "It definitely did not look like a commercial plane," Birnbach said on air. "I didn't see any windows on the sides."
Oh wait so now Fox is a reliable news source.......
Birnbach, who was a freelance videographer with FOX News at the time, tells PM that he was more than 2 miles southeast of the WTC, in Brooklyn. Do you really think you would be able to see windows in airliner at 2 miles away with the naked eye?
9/11 was a horrific event that many still to this day can't believe happened but it did. Conspiracy purveyors tend to grasp on to far out ideas while ignoring the facts in front of them, its a way to try and cope with something they can not handle psychologically.