|
Id like to point out here that I think the FSC really dropped the ball on this one anyway. The secondary producer thing is all fine and dandy but IMNSHO its the weakest argument of the bunch.
It seems to me the strong argument would have negated the entire law by simply saying how is someone supposed to be criminally held responsible for not being able to prove he didnt commit a crime that never happened.
The whole idea is ludicrous as is the idea that they can enter my residence with no warrant and help themselves to information they can use to charge me with a crime.
Had the FSC attacked on these levels I might be more supportive.
But getting back to the matter at hand These regs have nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with making it easier to came down on the adult industry without having to draw obscenity convictions, see it for what it really is people.
Whether I deliver my name address and weaknesses to an enemy who has vowed to destroy me through a third party or whether I do it directly I dont see what difference it makes maybe they do have all this info already but at least I wasnt enough of a sheep to hand deliver it to them.
As for Kernes thinking the Democrats will be our saviour...dream on Mark theyd sell out porners as quick as the republicans would.
Maybe its time to become Canadian.
__________________
Mike South
It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.
|