Quote:
Originally Posted by tony404
Mr Cummings I have great respect for you but you dont seem to understand the reasons all these changes were made is to fuck with us.If they got a million letters they wouldn't give a shit because there are Christian extremists that have full access to the white house and a great number of them also work for the DOJ. http://www.boston.com/news/education...an_law_school/ The reason for the changes wasnt to protect kids it was to give them more ammo against us, to scare the little mom pops out of the business. Also this comes from on top, for gods sake they fired two atty's because they wouldnt go after adult cases. The FSC shouldnt be worried about letter writing ,they should be putting 110% of their efforts in the legal battle that has to be won and if the legal minds they have arent winning its time for new ones. |
I DO understand, and I also understand that the future litigation will be stronger if FSC can point to considerable comments from within the Industry concerning the burdensomeness, and the many other aspects that some (too few, though IMO) letter-writers have addressed; the attorneys know what they are doing, and had FSC suggest our help, yet very few of us saw the need or just assumed that the radical religious type would continue to have the ear of the government. By the time this stuff gets to court, the democrats might be in power (after all, FSC can't file until the final regs are published, something that might not happen until 2008); the constitutional issues will be determined by the courts, not by the right-wingers. The courts will look at our issues and make decision--what a shame so many here didn't bother to write comments that can later be addressed in LARGE numbers in front of a judge. I fear that we have possibly shot ourselves in the foot by "giving up" now when it's a long lead time before this gets to court. IMO, our comments should have been numerous and recently submitted in order for the courts to have that input when the litigation is ripe.
dave