Originally Posted by Stamen

I saw the fight exactly how it was scored. Hamill was much improved and looked dominating, but the fact is that aside from round 1, he didn't do much damage. By the end of the 2nd round he had pretty much stopped doing anything other than a couple of sloppy takedowns.

Bisping however never stopped punching, had some pretty good stuffs on the takedowns and was the only one attempting techniques while they were on the ground by going for the triangles.

When you take a look at the scoring rules for the judges in UFC, you'll see that Bisping rightfully won that fight, but that it was definitely close, if Hamill would have pushed the action a bit in the 3rd it would have been his for sure.