Quote:
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
Again there would be a victim and a lie. However they do as well as many other news outlets make people guilty in the press by saying alleged pedophile and then continuing on with the story of how I allegedly raped a child. Do you not get the point of victim and thought crime?
Or wait should everyone in Hollywood who has made films about teens as well as children having sex (audio, visual, as well as textual do to closed caption etc) be convicted as well?
We will not agree and I understand that. I would never do anything close to what this person is doing and I find them sick and vile. However I do happen to understand more than your giving me credit for.
|
you are reaching. its a simple obscenity case. nothing to do with a newly fabriated idea of convienence called "a thought crime"
a fucking nutjob was writing child rape fantasies down and selling memberships for other pedophiles to read and enjoy them. sorry... but in this case so far.. society says "no".
should hollywood be convicted of xyz? who knows? we're not talking about hollywood producing films about child rape fantasies that target pedophiles. if they did and came under the same pressure as this person, i think only a fucking moron would express any degree of shock or surprise.
and again... you keep ignoring the simple point that all speech is not protected, nor should it be.