Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
again... you dodged the point. the New York Times is going to call you a pedophile in tomorrows issue. according to the arguments of you and others here, thats "free speech" that should be protected... because afterall, according to you, you have to defend the worst of the worst.
|
Again there would be a victim and a lie. However they do as well as many other news outlets make people guilty in the press by saying alleged pedophile and then continuing on with the story of how I allegedly raped a child. Do you not get the point of victim and thought crime?
Or wait should everyone in Hollywood who has made films about teens as well as children having sex (audio, visual, as well as textual do to closed caption etc) be convicted as well?
We will not agree and I understand that. I would never do anything close to what this person is doing and I find them sick and vile. However I do happen to understand more than your giving me credit for.