Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Sorry, but I have to disagree. That is the mentality that has turned the US constitution from a guideline into a series of bizarre absolutes. We have to support people's right to whack off to 5 year old children getting rapes so that we can be able to sell regular straight porn featuring two adults fucking... that is truly dumb.
Not all speech is protected speech. In the same manner that some visual material can be obscene, certain types of speech can be obscene or objectionable as well. It really shouldn't be that hard to say "explicit sexual material of any sort involving minors is not permissible". I cannot picture any sane adult saying "we need to protect the child porn stories and kiddie abuse stories for people to whack off to".
Don't fall into the trap of bizarre absolutes... it is what the people who seek to abuse the rights do to try to make themselves blend in.
|
Yes we have to protect that persons right. Free speech was set up to protect the most vile, most distastefull, and or hatefull speech that the majority of the population would rather see prevented. It is to protect that .000001% and not the rest.
We are not protecting people wacking off to thought crimes envolving children, we are protecting all forms of speech that the majority may not like.