|
Well if it was determined the kidnapper had a lethal weapon in the United States the kidnapper would have been killed. Infact I can not hink of a situation as of late where a kidnapper was not killed if he had a fire arm and was considered armed and dangerous when confronted. Unless of course he surrendered quickly.
I really do not see the difference in this outcome from the USA or China, unless China has a law that states that its good and fine to kill someone in a non lethal or life threatening crime scene.
The example does not say the kidnapper had a lethal weapon or does not.
In the USA he would have been shot the same way if he had a lethal weapon.
Not by a pistol though but by a sharp shooter using a sniper rifle.
Which would have been a bigger gun.
|