Yeah, alot of their expert responses were pretty weak too. 3 things that gave me a chuckle about the expert explanation on some of the Pentagon questions:
on how a bad/inexperienced pilot that couldn't fly a Cessna let alone pull the maneuvers it took to fly into the Pentagon:
"He didn't need to be an expert, he wasn't taking off or landing, all he had to do was steer"
so diving down 10's of thousands of feet and evening out and flying 10 feet off the ground in a 100 ton Jet is just "Steering"
Their "expert response" to the small round hole coming out of the 3rd ring at the pentagon even after they agreed that the nose of a plane is very fragile:
"once the jet hit the pentagon and entered the first ring, the jet fuel exploded and turned the front of the jet into a missile that then blew thru 2 more pentagon rings........
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Then why didn't it do the same thing to the jets that hit the towers? the front of the planes blowing thru those towers and coming out the other side as a missile would be a hellava lot easier than blowing thru 3 concrete and steel enforced rings of the Pentagon.
Lastly, I''ve seen alot of people say that the reason they don't want to release any of the tapes from over 20 different cameras pointing at that part of the Pentagon is for security reasons. I call bullshit. Then why did they release a bullshit tape that you can't see anything and say it's the complete tape and that's all they have, why not just say no to the requests. Also, a fucking plane supposedly smashed thru 3 walls of the pentagon, I don't think their security is really in need of being hidden, it obviously barely exists and the worst case scenario pretty much already happened.
I'd say everyone's stories on both sides are pretty thin.