Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog
Okay, I am trying to be open minded about the guy . . . but . . .
He is on the Daily Show, the topic is his inexperience, or lack thereof.
Part of his reply, along the lines of, "no one has longer resumes' than Rumsfeld and Cheney, and that did not work out too well."
Fine. The only problem is, they were not President. They were, for all intents and purposes, advisers.
Is he saying that if he wins he will surround himself with advisers with short resumes' and little experience (like him and Bush)? Or will he also surround himself with old school?
|
I agree with his point that having a long resume doesn't make you a competant leader, but neither does having a short one make you a better choice for the job.
I think he was terribly dull on The Daily Show, personally, and that like Kerry, Jon Stewert pitched him a slow ball, and he bunted.
I think America needs a LEADER. Someone that will inspire it's citizens, and make them proud again. Not a leader that will make us travellers tell people in foriegn lands that they are from Canada....
I'm sad to say that I can't really see any great leaderss emerging from either side. I see people getting elected as an alternative to what we have now, but that's not good enough. Lethal injection is an alternative to the electric chair, but the end result is pretty much the same, no?