Quote:
Originally Posted by swampthing
Thanks for the response, I think Im pretty much schooled up on the 2257 issue, however Im concerned about the adam walsh act.
Like 2257, from what I understand about the adam walsh act, also requires webmasters, primary and secondary, to hold records as well.
If this is the case, does the adam walsh act have to refer to the record keeping requirements outlined in 2257, which is of course still in the courts, in order for an inspection to take place?
What does the significance of the adam walsh act have on record keeping requirements?
|
A lot of it remains to be seen. The adam walsh act basically says that webmasters have to maintain docs cross reference all their urls with those docs and basically do almost everything that the primary producers do. There is more to it than that though. Also the proposed changes have just been published. the comment period ends soon then we wait to see how the final rules look when published and what comes of them in court.