Quote:
Originally Posted by Jet
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...19/wzim119.xml
Fifteen million people beaten and starved into mud-eating poverty so that 1 octogenarian, reverse-racist, tribal kleptocrat can build yet one more palace for his mistresses?
And the African nations that sit by doing nothing prove themselves unworthy of their standing in the world.
To hell African nations, what about the UN? Where are people like Bush who were so determined to rid the world of Saddam Hussein for supposedly the same reasons?
Oh, I forgot, Zimbabwe doesn't have any oil.
|
man this post has a lot of naive thinking in it caused by simple brainwashing of left wing fanatics
first off.. THE BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN IRAQ AND ZIMBABWE is not oil BUT LEVEL OF THREAT
zimbabwe can do whatever UNETHICAL SHIT that want to but if it doesnt HARM or THREAT any other Nation WHY THE FUCK SHUD THEY CARE..
you dont spend BILLIONS in army spending to HELP PPL, you spend billions on Armies to DEFEND YOURSELF WHEN A THREAT COMES ALONG
my friend, you shouldnt blame bush or even compare this to IRAQ since theres not even 0.0000001% similarity BUT YOU SHOULD BLAME UN
THE UN should be fixing these areas, and actually your first person to BLAME is AU "african union", they should be spending all army presences in these kind of areas..
dont expect outsiders to help you until you help yourself
southasia, africa were all under colonial rule...where as south asia is flourishing now and have armies to help themselves even when the worst tsunamis and earthquakes are happning there..
africa for some reason is still having trouble fighting man made disasters..
they need to pick up their game