Originally Posted by davecummings

I'm not qualified to make a judgment about "the performance of the FSC attorney's", but I did see them get a TRO for Secondary producers (and I have seen Primary producers being inspected, but NO Secondary producers).

FSC success in getting that TRO resulted in Secondary producers NOT being subject to inspection by the DOJ/FBI; IMHO, it's inapporpriate to fault/blame the "FSC attorney's" because the FSC TRO success was thwarted by Congress SUBSEQUENTLY adding the inclusion of Secondary Producers to a subsequent law (Adam-Walsh), something that I understand was slipped in without any Congressional hearings.

Rather than debating the success of FSC, I personally will focus on the present opportunity to provide input to FSC/DOJ that is intended to help the Adult Industry.

Dave