|
heh, yeah I wouldnt expect it to "work" in terms of preventing everyone from uploading unlicensed content.
But if a site doesn't state that you are not to upload content which you are not licensed to publish, couldnt someone argue that you passively support it (by not caring to even mention it)? Seems like a decent "cover your own ass" type of thing.
I think people will be watching the youtube/viacom suit pretty closely in any case for precedent.
__________________
43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar. 
|