Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
The only link is small, and located BELOW THE FOLD on a 1600X1200 screen. On an 800 X 600 or 1200X whatever, it would be two full screens below the video.
It is clear that the intent of the site is to generate hits to cam sites, dating sites, to etology pay per click ads, and importantly to get people to signup to xtube to pay for videos on their VOD system. It is not designed in the slightest to get traffic to the site that the video comes from.
Any program owner that thinks they are getting a good deal on that should contact me about the sunny warm lake front property I am selling cheap in Nunavut.
|
See this is what worries me, they already seem to be most worried about sending traffic to their ?sponsor? and try to kind of hide where it came from. Now I understand they need to make money, but I know how these things go soon they see the contributors are completion and think they can fix the traffic links by just removing as many of them as possible to increases their profits.
Now I am not sure this is what?s going on, but really when you start to talk about banning ALL WM?s for a site built on content provided by them it just seems fishy. And to add to all this they are not really telling anyone what is going on they come to a WM board and say hey what do you think about us banning all WM?s. How do you think this is going to go?