Quote:
Originally Posted by baycouples
Dave, what are you judging the performance of the FSC attorney's? I'm judging it by the results, which leads me to ask a question that you didn't really answer: how are we better off now than before this lawsuit?
From where I see it - the FSC's attorney haven't gained a ground. I see no results.
|
I'm not qualified to make a judgment about "the performance of the FSC attorney's", but I did see them get a TRO for Secondary producers (and I have seen Primary producers being inspected, but NO Secondary producers).
FSC success in getting that TRO resulted in Secondary producers NOT being subject to inspection by the DOJ/FBI; IMHO, it's inapporpriate to fault/blame the "FSC attorney's" because the FSC TRO success was thwarted by Congress SUBSEQUENTLY adding the inclusion of Secondary Producers to a subsequent law (Adam-Walsh), something that I understand was slipped in without any Congressional hearings.
Rather than debating the success of FSC, I personally will focus on the present opportunity to provide input to FSC/DOJ that is intended to help the Adult Industry.
Dave