Quote:
Originally posted by iwantchixx
Ya know, it wouldn't bother so much if it weren't for the fact of pedo's getting off on the shit, a young woman is a beutiful thing to capture in youth. But not buck naked and bent over implying you-know-what. Afterall, when I was 16/17 I was chasing 16/17 y/o's :p But I was 16/17. Not some 45 year old who wants to explore every hole. heh
|
Well I've been looking at porn and dating/fucking girls at a young age. I remember being 16/17 and liking the 13/14 year olds. When I was 18 I dated a 15 year old (which is technically not legal). I think in general men like young looking girls, and there seems to be biological/genetical support for that as well (I explained this before in another teenmafia.com bashing thread). The teen niche isn't huge for nothing. These guys aren't pedos in the making, they're 100% healthy and normal guys. Girls that are sexually ripe, regardless of their age (sexually ripe could easily be 15/16) appeal to men because they make good child-bearers - that's genetics for ya.
HOWEVER, needless to say I do not condone 15/16 year olds in porn. 18 is the legal limit we've all agreed on and anyone crossing it should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. But that doesn't mean that young looking girls cater to pedos IF they look sexually ripe. One thing doesn't mean the other, if you're still following me.
Real pedos are into kids as objects of their sexual perversions. There *is* a difference. However after multiple stirs, I'd still advise TGF to get the proof from the sponsor... It'll clear the waters once and for all