Quote:
Originally posted by ab1183
What I am saying is that to me, not comply last time was because they had something that they werent supposed to have. And if that is the case, where did these things go? They didnt just disappear. Which means that they may still have them. But even if the inspectors go in and say "We found 18 nuclear bombs" tree huggers like you will say "well, he isnt attacking anyone, he isnt using them, so we should just pretend he doesnt have them" Then he uses them and then you people think something should be done. How many innocent people will die then? We should do something before it gets that far.
|
Sounds like you got a 'A' from Bush Brainwash 101
I think you missed it, but IRAQ is claiming that they destroyed all the weaponds in question in 1998. The issue here is not wether you believe that or not, the issue is "where is the motherfing proof?"
Bush promised us that he had proof, and that proof would be reason enough to attck Iraq. Only problem is, I see no proof, you see no proof. my dog sees no proof. But bush apparently has proof, yet despite calls from everyone and their mother for Bush to show that proof, we still see no proof.
Show me some proof, or I am gonna still say this is about oil.