Looks like a preventative measure to me. Right or wrong, if you "blog" about underage teens and being a predator who lusts after people's kids, is it so farfetched to expect some reaction from the public?
Quote:
|
For years, McClellan maintained a Web site in Washington where he posted photos of children he had taken in public places. He also discussed how he liked to stake out parks, public libraries, fast-food restaurants and other areas where little girls, or "LGs," congregate.
|
Granting such a restraining order may very well be a violation of his so-called rights, but really, boo fucking hoo. If he doesn't like the attention he's getting maybe he should have kept his penchant for stalking and lusting after little girls private instead of plastering it all over the web.
He's a piece of shit who deserves what he gets.