Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
You didn't get it. For example cnn.com has 123 "errors" however it shows well in all browsers I know and the SE's love it. maturedesign.com you have pointed me to has only 39 errors and it also shows well in every browser, so why could I care about it? |
Because the crux of your argument was that non-visual editors are effectively useless, which simply isn't true, and just because it shows correctly in the browsers you use and ranks well in the SERPs doesn't mean that it won't lead to problems for users with disabilities, nor that other aspects such as bandwidth usage and disk space, particularly on larger sites with millions of hits per day could be vastly improved if people coded to the standards and cut out a lot of the bloatcode that WYSIWYG editors add.