Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
I was thinking the same thing. They are basically trying to hold a secondary producer libel for something he can not control.
The secondary producer never meets the model nor do they have a chance to inspect the models ID. For all we know a "scanned" ID was done in Photoshop.
That's like trying to hold walmart libel because Niki used child labor to make shoes walmart sells.
|
sadly this isn't about fairness - it's about making it more difficult for the adult industry to survive in a free society. They can't take away the rights we have, but they can sure make it more difficult for us to assert them.
Once again mainstream adult content is being grouped in with underground illegal content and we are all seen as producers of it. Talking to people I mention how much we hate CP and want to stop it and their responses are, "but your in the adult industry, you and your friends there I thought were creating it? Aren't you all the same?"
If they seriously want to stop pedophiles - start putting regulations on the churches.