Re-read the 2257 again Sands
Ok Sands,
You are telling me every webmaster is required by US law as to have each and every adult record on their ages, home address and other misc contact information that is protected under US law(s) ?
If you had read what I have posted instead of trying to troll you would have read that the issue is not really the 2257 but who has the legal right to the private records of the actors... The 2257 law states very clearly that if there is no actual control over the content that such parties are not required to keep the 2257 record. I still think keeping the 2257 record pointing to the actual records is a good thing but that is not what I have been stating... The "actors" records are protected under US law...
When you purchase adult content as to sell... yea of course you will need the actual records of your actors... however the associate programs that most webmasters use have full control over the rights to their content and the associates have no control...
If I'm not mistaken... the paragraph is about 3/4 way down the new 2257...
Am I going to fast for you... should I type this in slower for you ?
.
|