Quote:
Originally Posted by uno
There isn't an issue with NATS. CCBill has been something that people have been requesting since we moved. Some people prefer the lump checks of CCBill, some people prefer the stats of NATS. NATS and ccbill track clicks differently. We have affiliates on both sides who have very good ratios. Some see to do worse with nats, others seem to do worse with CCBill. Why not give affiliates what they want and give them the most options we can?
|
Okay. Now if I switch over to the CCBill codes, and I still have some NATS codes running as well, will that be an issue?
(Nice dodge BTW on the answer... smooth!).
As for galleries, you might try a more simple script to handle the FHG on your sites directly and do the sponsor code replace with CCBill codes right on the galleries.