Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Okay, so I notice nobody is addressing what for me seems the obvious question:
Is there an issue with NATS? Do programs convert better going directly through CCBill rather than through NATS? Is there something we should be aware of, considering that probably 40% of my sponsors are running NATS these days?
Really... do tell!
|
There isn't an issue with NATS. CCBill has been something that people have been requesting since we moved. Some people prefer the lump checks of CCBill, some people prefer the stats of NATS. NATS and ccbill track clicks differently. We have affiliates on both sides who have very good ratios. Some see to do worse with nats, others seem to do worse with CCBill. Why not give affiliates what they want and give them the most options we can?