Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadFidel
Perhaps you're correct in that it is water under the bridge, but you must admit that back in 1969 the profited from stealing others music. I dig the band and I would pay to see them again, ( MSG 1977 bleed nose seat but I saw them)
But look at all the threads about stolen pussy content HERE. Is there a difference?
|
There is a difference. Lawsuits occured back then, and Led Zeppelin settled them (at least the ones I've read about, such as the one with Willie Dixon) out of court, funds were paid (thus negating your argument that not a penny was paid to the writer), and credits were given.
Like there weren't tons of other 'artists" back then covering other's songs and not giving credit.
Are there any pending lawsuits against the band today? If not maybe it's time to move on.