Quote:
Originally Posted by gero
In this case we are open for any suggestions what can provide us same performance issues with the servers.
If we won't get better ideas, and if that's a comforting issue for webmasters, we would gladly switch back to the PHP-based version even if it's 10 times slower, and we need to set up 3-4 new servers.
|
It depends on the amount of customers who have javascript disabled. I have no idea if it is a significant number.
With respect to the server performance, I have to rely on your statement. So it only makes sence to change to PHP solutions again if the investment is justified by the amount of customers who do not allow javascript.