Quote:
Originally Posted by gero
Hi Guys, and especially Asir Madul!
I'd like to give you some advices what I have already learned from life. Before you make a statement on anything, it's better if you get to a certain level of knowledge on that issue, otherwise you will easily end up looking like a total idiot.
Also calling somebody a shaver is a big aspersion, mostly if you don't have proof. In the civilized part of the world you can get easily sued for such statements, and you might end up paying a great sum of cash in the name of defamation.
So after you read our post on how NATS works with our FHGs, and after you realized that WE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH SHAVING, I hope you feel really ashamed, and ask for apologies.
Thank you
|
Those shaving accusations are really not the politest way to discuss technical problems. I think we figured out how the script works yesterday and itīs pretty much the same as Zoltan has explained the functionality.
Nevertheless the variable in the script setting the code could easily be replaced. Thatīs not an accusation of shaving, thatīs a matter of fact. You may understand that webmasters are worried about it nowadays.
In my opinion the real annoying thing is that this javascript solution causes problems if the customer has disabled javascript. As I was taught yesterday, those customers canīt go through to the tour. So the customer is lost for the sending webmaster.
I donīt know if, but maybe there are better solutions.