Quote:
Originally Posted by RightHandMan
Right ALMOST, but were talking about PORN, and the "exploitation" of women.
IMO, its more akin to someone suing McDonalds because they eat there and they got fat, or
if you shovel the snow on your sidewalk away, but somebody busts their ass on it anyway, they can sue, but if you diddnt shovel and they bust their ass, no big deal or
Someone breaks into your house and your dog bites them, but because you diddnt have "beware of dog" signs outfront, the robber can sue you and win.
Is there anychance This Solo Girl could have a case in a situation like this???
|
who is the sologirl? cmon spill the beans allready.
It all comes down to contracts. Thats the exact reason why they exist.
If the girl decides she wants to take a content producer to court in order to try and clean up her image, shes opening up a whole new can of worms that she will most likely regret ten fold.
Forget someone about recognizing her. She will now have her real name connected to the case as public record, and anyone who wants to do a background check on her, can easily look up that info in 1-2-3 seconds.
and thats the best case scenario, even if she wins, which I'm 100% sure she won't if she signed a contract. In that case, her images are still online, and now she has a public record linking her real name to such images.
If she was paid for images, and signed a release, It's probably in her best interest to shut the fuck up, or the content producer can easily sell said images as webmaster content, and every joe blow around the world will have a copy of her ID.
Solo Girl needs to realize she is not the first girl to change her mind about being looked at as a sex object, and thats why there is a contract.
So all the what ifs, hold no water, period.