The law pertains to images of explicit or simulated sex. Thus you would not be required to comply with 2257 for content absent explicit or simulated sex. Even if the content is soft core from an explicit shoot you would not be required to comply with 2257 because you are not displaying any imagery which requires compliance with the same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by beks001
So basically what you're saying is that eitherway as a webmaster you must have 2257 records for every shoot that you use even if the images you are showing are non-explicit, providing the shoot contained explicit actions at some point? Wouldn't most shoots contain explicit actions at some point or another so the webmaster hosting pics that he is showing regradless of the explicity being shown is deemed to have those records on hand? Can somebody clarify this????
|