Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMaster
is anyone watching this insanity called the Republican debate?
these fuckers are actually considering using tactical nukes
against Iran? please, can we say overkill?
you have more than enough conventional weapons to level Iran if you really would want to, using a nuke WILL start WO III
when will this macho cowboy bullshit stop?
|
The President of Iran has publically stated that they will not rest until they destroy Isreal. I see no reason why a preemptive strike with tactical nukes to teach them a lesson isn't both valid and legal.
In fact, I believe Congress approved a document called NS 2002 which partially states.....
"Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists, the United States can no longer rely on a reactive posture..... The inablity ti deter a potential attacker, the immedicay of today's threats, and the magnitude of potential harm that could be caused by our adversaries' choice of weapons, do not permit that option. We cannot let our enemies strike first"
(not that I copied that from hand from a book, not cut an paste)
Seems to me like we can strike anyone for any reason at any time.
Perhaps we should. It would start teaching people a lesson. I'm guessing the terrorists would find it most difficult to operate when they have radiation sickness. At the very least it would make watching the news on TV much more interesting.
Everyone should thank God I don't work in the White House.